April 2013
I'm revisiting the fifties today.
I feel like I'm contradicting the fantastic Mad Men post
that we had yesterday, that saw women propel out of the kitchen and into the
workplace with a fabulous wardrobe to match. Due to a technical hitch, I was
forced to dig into my vintage archives today, and found this little summertime
gem. It's currently gathering dust in my wardrobe, and I've been staring at it
so lovingly for the past few days, willing for the slightest bit of sun to
arrive so I can give it a day out. But, alas, we're living in England, and the
only way this dress is going to be seen is through a blog post.
This New Look, first introduced by
Christian Dior in 1947, has an almost disappointing motive. You may have
noticed by now that my posts always seem to refer to Wartime England, so I'm
going to have to apologise for bringing it up once more. Women worked their way
through the war, on the land; as we've already seen, in factories, in
hospitals.
They were forced out of the stereotypical 'angel in the household'
roles that were still very much in place at the beginning of the century. It was, however, these styles that
emerged post-war that encouraged women back into their previous domestic roles,
let's be honest, they may be beautiful but these dresses were hardly practical
for the working woman. No, they were much more suited to housewives.
Let us take a moment to admire the wonderful Coco Chanel, who was prompted out
of retirement when she first saw the New Look. "
"Christian Dior doesn't dress
women," She said, scathingly "He upholsters them." Beautiful dresses, yes. Wonderful
summer style, yes. Excellent motives? Debatable. Needless to say, I'm siding with Coco.
Dress: Cath Kidston. Accessories: Cath Kidston. Boat: Not mine,
sadly.
No comments:
Post a Comment